Posted on 02/24/2018 12:30:16 PM PST by Innovative
A mother and daughter took matters into their own hands and shot a would-be robber at their liquor store in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Police said the man was armed with a shotgun and demanded money. When he walked away, one of the women reached for a handgun under the counter and shot the suspect.
The man managed to grab the mother and that's when the daughter shot him again. He was taken to a hospital in critical condition.
(Excerpt) Read more at abc7.com ...
...to draw a chalk line around their dead bodies.
A gun used to protect innocent people. So when will this be mentioned by the Propaganda Wing of the Democratic Party?
Bullshit. Did you see the tape? He was clearly an imminent threat to her mother's life. I am truly sorry she did not shoot the son of bitch in the brain. Not even a Massachusetts DA would prefer charges against her.
Shame taxpayers will pay to keep this thug alive. I say go ahead an bury his sorry ass.
Luv our 2nd admend gals!!
I bet not in Oklahoma. Not a single county voted for Obama or Clinton. Great people.
He wasn’t walking away. He was backing up WITH a shotgun in his hands. Good shoot and you have no clue what you are talking about. You should stay within 100 miles of the east coast. That’d be best.
They’ll get a medal out west.
“Either way, I don’t care, but often the asinine Democrat pansy law does.”
You should research the success rate of the Democrat party in Oklahoma.
Uh oh. Shot in back? They’re going down.
Not in Oklahoma. Perp was fighting mom for her gun. Daughter responded legally to the the threat. Too bad her semi auto wasn’t a larger caliber.
In that situation, I would have no problem shooting Tyrone in the back.
regards - red
“you have no clue” “stay on east coast” - OK with the hostile talk. You have no clue how conservative I am, so your comments based just on my observations of facts are moot. I’m going by a) typical law and b) what I see so far. NOT what I think. I think one should be able to kill no matter which way they’re headed or if they only took your Pez dispenser. So much for your flippant “east coast” comment.
I looked at an entire video, although said video did NOT show what perp was doing. Maybe there is an outside video that shows that but I haven’t yet seen it. I can only go on what I see there and the article. The first person to fire that can be seen is Mom (not the daughter) when the perp is off camera, apparently out the door as the door dinger can be heard again and what looks like a door frame just to the right.
I’ll change my mind if more facts come to light. Frankly I don’t care personally if they shot him in the back. But often, the law does.
Your reference to “imminent threat” is AFTER the mom already shot at and pursued the perp before he grabbed her.
Stop the hostile talk/foul language. I’m interested in facts. Hoping the facts in OK are that it’s “OK” to shoot a robber “walking away”, if that’s what he was doing (cannot see on film, going by write-up). In most places, not so much.
Again - the first shots were by Mom, after he apparently left the shop (yes, he had threatened them with gun). Perp fighting was when he returned after she had shot at him a couple times and pursued him too closely, apparently.
Do I have a problem? NO. I wish people would get that through their heads. It’s the law that usually has a problem.
So find the ordinances in the locality that deal with these situations; that is the question to me (or if the guy was still threatening off-camera while backing up). OK may be conservative, but many jurisdictions have gone spineless with so much pervasive Democrat societal influence everywhere.
See the whole video in post 23. the perp came back to the counter at the bottom of the screen where he was first shot in the chest by mama.
Good shoot. You’ll see.
Don’t know how many times I can write that I saw that video already (while most posting did not watch that).
Yes, he came back, why I don’t know. He probably threatened them as he did before, at least holding the gun at them. Apparently (though it’s hard to tell) Mom shot at him first.
THEN, the perp apparently disappears from the store again, and she continues firing. No idea what is actually happening off screen - he may be turning tail, he may be firing at them, but it’s not on there. It is at this point, though, that Mom is firing presumably at someone going away, although we don’t know (again, I emphasize this) what he is doing exactly.
It’s my understanding it doesn’t matter at which point in the action you were firing at a “retreating” person. It only matters if they are firing at you/aiming at you at the same time.
Of course, we need to know 2 things:
-what is the exact law in this jurisdiction?
-what was the perp doing when she fired at him off camera?
I don’t mind that they shoot. It’s the law that often does. All the protestations that this is “conservative country” makes little difference that the law could still be ninny liberal stuff.
Next time shoot the thugs below the waist...so he won’t make any bloodsuckers...
The man managed to grab the mother and that’s when the daughter shot him again. He was taken to a hospital in critical condition.
The man managed to grab the mother and that’s when the daughter shot him again. He was taken to a hospital in critical condition.
The man managed to grab the mother and that’s when the daughter shot him again. He was taken to a hospital in critical condition.
(Love happy endings!)
No. Dude, that video shows him coming back to the counter before any shots were fired and mama shooting him in the chest. If you watch both videos, the one posted with the article does not show that shot, as though it has been edited out.
Watch them both again, you’ll see mama shooting at him while he’s off screen in both, only in the video in post 23 you get the whole sequence of events.
Those women were WARRIORS. They had a little trouble putting the guy down, but I’m not going to say I would have done any better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.