I can’t believe David French made a cogent point.
Since the liberals have rendered it almost impossible to forcibly institutionalize someone for aberrant mental behavior, there is frequently no record.
Since the Government apparently failed again, like in Texas to do their duty, there is no record.
The GRVO isn’t a bad idea. There must be protections for the person receiving the restraining order, such as a defined time to review and a probationary period after which, if certain criteria are met, full rights are restored.
But in essence, it’s a very good idea.
A year or two ago, my son was acting out a bit and having some emotional issues. I had decided that if it got any worse, removing any access to firearms was in order.
It turned out that his was due to a specific medical issue which was finally diagnosed a week or two later, so the issue went away as his treatment began. The physical pain he was in had a known side effect of emotional distress.
“The GRVO isn’t a bad idea. There must be protections for the person receiving the restraining order, such as a defined time to review and a probationary period after which, if certain criteria are met, full rights are restored.”
Like a comedy violence restraining order?