Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robroys woman

“you have effectively disarmed everyone”

That whole theory hinges on the the shooter obeying the law. So you haven’t effectively disarmed everyone. You have disarmed everyone who is not a shooter.


11 posted on 02/21/2018 6:36:33 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy

That whole theory hinges on the the shooter obeying the law. So you haven’t effectively disarmed everyone. You have disarmed everyone who is not a shooter.


Exactly. You have disarmed everyone except those who wish to shoot some. i.e. the “everyone except the shooter” as implied.

And the result is that you have assumed full LEGAL responsibility for the safety of everyone inside the perimeter of the gun free zone. So if someone DOES get in and shoot anyone, it’s on you - legally.

Doing it the way schools now do it is hopelessly irresponsible. It does not reflect best practices nor due diligence. It’s time they choose one of the options and be prepared to take legal responsibility if they choose number 2.


15 posted on 02/21/2018 6:42:09 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson