Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JudyinCanada
Ok, at the risk of being eviscerated because of lack of knowledge, what is wrong with tougher background checks?

No knives out here, just a reasoned response. Any new demand would be touted as "a good first step", with the undeclared last step being confiscation.

As outlined by others, the system works IF the authorities keep the proscribed list up to date, which they didn't do in this and other cases.

Please review the gun buying application we here in the States have to fill out when buying from a licensed dealer and tell us what changes you would make to it to preclude further tragedies like this. (Note that this is an obsolete form (2005) and a change regarding race has been made. Also note that a photo ID must be submitted to the dealer.):

and

Note Section D in the second form. This is why "Universal Background Check" (mandatory for all private, non-FFL sales) is pushed by the liberals. With that info they would know who has what and where they are - must needs for Universal Confiscation.

159 posted on 02/19/2018 3:04:08 PM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka

Very helpful! Thanks for the trouble you went to post this. I really am green when it comes to any gun purchasing, but understand that an armed citizenry is the only thing that keeps a tyrannical regime at bay. North Korea would not be North Korea with an armed population.


162 posted on 02/19/2018 4:02:24 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson