Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrankR

In most towns, when people from the outside came in, they needed to surrender their firearms. It was not a big deal. EVERYONE did it.

Hardly anyone “wore” a firearm unless they were out on the farm or range. And then it was more to kill snakes, wolves, and coyotes.

The people who think the wild west is “cool” would be the same people who think “gang violence” is cool today.

A little bit of reading kills a whole lot of hollywood.


43 posted on 02/19/2018 7:01:35 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

Surrendering in town was a good idea, but the towns were small, and everyone knew everyone.

Drinking in the saloons and brothels, combined with the ready availability of a gun, was not a good mix. Even if it was just reveling and celebrating, someone could get hurt.

But, back to the original question, no one wants the “wild west” back again, but we do maintain our right to protect ourselves and our families from harm.


53 posted on 02/19/2018 7:14:01 AM PST by FrankR (An armed society is a polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson