Replies

Spool down in the thread, deep legal implications

1 posted on 02/18/2018 6:01:20 PM PST by gaijin

2 posted on 02/18/2018 6:01:55 PM PST by gaijin

Cernovich isn’t 100% by any means.

3 posted on 02/18/2018 6:02:27 PM PST by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)

If true, and this guy has had legit info before....will blow this thing wide open.

4 posted on 02/18/2018 6:04:35 PM PST by LongWayHome

5 posted on 02/18/2018 6:06:57 PM PST by gaijin

To: gaijin; aynrandfreak

Unabashed Mike Cernovich fan here.

11 posted on 02/18/2018 6:13:25 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Run every name through www.alamo-girl.com)

15 posted on 02/18/2018 6:15:37 PM PST by gaijin

If this turns out to be true, then it’s time - finally - for the B! word.

20 posted on 02/18/2018 6:18:54 PM PST by Ken H (Best election ever!)

"deep legal implications"

Hmmmm . . . aw, come on. surely you jest.

27 posted on 02/18/2018 6:26:43 PM PST by saywhatagain

Anyone ever figure out what Agent Strzok meant by the needed “insurance policy?”

31 posted on 02/18/2018 6:28:33 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (#releasethememo)

To: gaijin; bitt

Thanks for posting, gaijin !

Ping to

McCabe Altered Strzok’s 302 Account of Flynn Interview

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3633257/posts?page=1#1

37 posted on 02/18/2018 6:42:35 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)

If what Cernovich found is true, then the following makes sense.( I hung on to it cause it didn't make sense. )

The FBI originally described Flynn's response to questions as truthful.
(From CNN) 02/15/2017 - 2 days after Flynn resigned. (I couldn't find the FBI source for this below.)

"The FBI is saying that barring new information, they're not going to pursue charges against him. They add that in their conversations with him that he
was forthcoming. He did not hide the truth. They say that if he forgot certain details of things he was not intentionally misleading. So if they
don't learn anything new they're not going to pursue charges.”
fbi-not-expected-to-pursue-charges-against-flynn

If the above was true, why did the FBI all of a sudden decide to charge Flynn with lying?
10 months later? and why does he agree to a plea deal with Mueller ?
Couple of things make sense. 1. Save his son 2. Save the Presidency.
I would love to know the details of how Flynn got to his plea deal. (Though it now seems we are getting bits and pieces of that)

See NPR’s take at link below
intelligence-official-transcripts-of-flynns-calls-dont-show-criminal-wrongdoing

47 posted on 02/18/2018 7:13:16 PM PST by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

Hope his source is better than whatever led him to rant about pizzagate

48 posted on 02/18/2018 7:13:50 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)

56 posted on 02/18/2018 7:43:14 PM PST by timestax

That explains how Comey could testify under oath that they had concluded Flynn didn’t lie, yet his buddy Mueller could bully Flynn into a guilty plea.

61 posted on 02/18/2018 8:20:18 PM PST by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)

If this is true, it’s game, set, and match for Flynn.

63 posted on 02/18/2018 8:22:20 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (President Trump divides Americans . . . from anti-Americans.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794