Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Fine. The teachers were "warned".

But, since the teachers were not armed and since teachers are no longer allowed to pick up delinquent drop-out former students by the scruffs of their necks and physically remove them from school property, what were the teachers supposed to do?

After all, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

The bottom line is, teachers in "Drug Free School Zones" have been rendered every bit as helpless as their students.

9 posted on 02/15/2018 5:46:24 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS
But, since the teachers were not armed and since teachers are no longer allowed to pick up delinquent drop-out former students by the scruffs of their necks and physically remove them from school property, what were the teachers supposed to do?

Personally I think teachers should be able to be armed if they so desire and are willing to accept the responsibility of confronting an intruder. Beyond that, my understanding in virtually all states they're required to report a student who is a danger to self in others to the authorities. Certainly the administrators should have reported him. "Fighting" is just another name for assault, and clearly they considered him a threat. What would the authorities do, hopefully advocate for a mental health commitment hearing. If committed, he would have been unable to purchase a firearm legally. All the laws we have covering these situations, they all failed.

31 posted on 02/15/2018 5:59:26 AM PST by SJackson (The easiest way to find something lost around the house is to buy a replacement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson