Posted on 02/06/2018 5:42:22 AM PST by markomalley
In the UK, “there has yet to be a single conviction for FGM despite tens of thousands of recorded cases since it was criminalised in 1985.”
The reason for that is abundantly clear: Muslims are the primary practitioners of female genital mutilation, and the UK police are afraid of appearing “Islamophobic,” just as in Rotherham, Muslim rape gangs preyed on over 1,400 non-Muslim girls while authorities did nothing for fear of appearing “racist.”
Instead of learning their lesson and enforcing the law against FGM, the Surrey Police just issued a rather plaintive call for children to “find your voice” and report FGM crimes. Then they followed this by warning that tweets containing “Islamophobic abuse” would be reported to Twitter, as well as to British intelligence.
Clearly, “Islamophobic abuse” is far more important to the Surrey Police than female genital mutilation. But what exactly constitutes “Islamophobic abuse”? The term is vague. Does it refer to calls for violence against innocent Muslims, which are never justified, or for pointing out the Islamic roots of the problem at hand? After all, the term “Islamophobia” has been used for both. If I point out that Muhammad is held to have said: “Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women” (Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 5:75), is that “Islamophobic abuse”? Or that he is also supposed to have said “Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband” (Abu Dawud 41:5251), is that “Islamophobic abuse”? In other words, may one point out the Islamic justifications for FGM, or will that get you hauled up before British intel?
Well, I’m already banned from the UK for the crime of pointing out the obvious and readily demonstrable fact was banned for saying that Islam “is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers,” so if British intelligence wants to open a new case against me, I don’t have any problem with that. I do, however, have a problem with their wasting their time policing the free speech of Britons, and using valuable time, money, personnel, and resources to do so, while real crime is spiraling out of control in London and elsewhere.
But priorities are priorities. Making sure no one thinks ill of Islam is by far more important to the British police than anything else. Britain is rapidly becoming a Sharia police state, as I have long predicted it would.
If you want to know who rules you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
“It’s a trap.” This sounds like it was flypaper to smoke out a few more infidels who might harbor any thoughts of opposing the Muslims who have taken over the country.
So if FGM is performed by say Christians, Jews, Hindus (plenty of those in the UK these days), or atheists (ditto) — report it.
The Beginnings
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.
They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.
Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.
by Rudyard Kipling
A phobia is an unreasonable or unwarranted fear. It is neither unwarranted nor unreasonable to fear a system which demands that you be subjugated, enslaved or killed if you refuse to embrace it. Thus, Islamophobia does not exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.