Posted on 02/04/2018 11:55:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yeah right! And I have a bridge in Arizona for sale.
Kallstrom, in his mid 70s and a big promoter of expanded surveillance power, has been promoting himself for FBI Director for a very long time.
Snarky comments just convince me that I’m right.
Ok, then here’s a question.
Have you ever tried to light a pan of kerosene?
Could not have hit the nail on the head any better.
Mysterious questions also convince me that I’m right.
You’d think the Left would be having a field day with that flow chart. Look at all those, White Faces. I think it needs more diversity.Yea like a black President.
There will be no prosecutions. None. They fully intend on continuing with these FISA related felonies, and as long as they keep it to people we don’t care about, we’ll go along.
Not to go full-blown conspiracy theorist on you, but the CIA illustration showing the B747 losing its nose, then zooming up sevaral thousand feed leaving a trail of flaming fuel, in order to explain what the literally hundreds of eye witnesses say was a missile rising up and hitting TWA 800, was complete and utter nonsense just from an aerodynamics perspective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwcSGbvM6yc
(And for those who don't remember, no, I'm not being paranoid when I said the CIA created the animation. That fact was made public when the video was released. Here is the CIA's version of the TWA800 investigation:)
https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/public-affairs/entertainment-industry-liaison/twaflight.pdf
Or head of the FBI
I’m good with either one
Not to go full-blown conspiracy theorist on you, but the CIA illustration showing the B747 losing its nose, then zooming up sevaral thousand feed leaving a trail of flaming fuel, in order to explain what the literally hundreds of eye witnesses say was a missile rising up and hitting TWA 800, was complete and utter nonsense just from an aerodynamics perspective.
...
Really? The NTSB ran a computer simulation based on physics. What have you done?
Some of the best witnesses saw no missile.
Anybody with experience in the judicial system knows that witness recollections are inconsistent, so they give more weight to forensic evidence. The forensic evidence says the center fuel tank exploded due to an electrical problem, and the tank being filled with a combustible mixture of fumes and air.
I’d call it the plain and obvious truth, but I wouldn’t expect you to be able to see it past your fetish for senators.
Like ‘em!
Respect is earned, and so is disrespect.
Lets give Attorney Gerbil Jeff all the disrespect he’s earned.
The NTSB used software not designed for the analysis required, and did so without input from Boeing, other than Boeing providing approximate weight and CG changes caused by losing the nose section. The NTSB ended up with a range of scenarios, none of which were represented fully by the animation.
NTSB Final Report, beginning on page 94: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0003.pdf
The NTSB used software not designed for the analysis required, and did so without input from Boeing, other than Boeing providing approximate weight and CG changes caused by losing the nose section. The NTSB ended up with a range of scenarios, none of which were represented fully by the animation.
...
If that’s true, then why hasn’t somebody done something better in the past 20 years? And as far as know the animation was done for demonstration purposes. It’s not part of the official report.
And as far as [I] know the animation was done for demonstration purposes. It’s not part of the official report.
You are correct, and that is precisely what Kallstrom's "sin" was, in trotting out that animation designed to discredit the eyewitnesses who described in documented FBI interviews a rising glowing object hit TWA 800.
http://www.flight800.org/eye2.html
I don't know if TWA 800 was downed by a terrorist in a "Cigarette" style offshore speed boat firing a MANPADS missile, or if an errant U.S. Navy live fire exercise accidentally downed the doomed airliner. All I do know is that TWA 800 was incapable of continuing to fly for over 40 seconds and to climb over 3,200 feet after losing its nose. It is aerodynamically impossible.
All I do know is that TWA 800 was incapable of continuing to fly for over 40 seconds and to climb over 3,200 feet after losing its nose. It is aerodynamically impossible.
...
It is possible. The simulation matches radar data and the debris field. If it’s not possible, then come up with your own simulation. The naysayers have had over twenty years to do it.
The investigation was led by the NTSB and the final and complete report on the investigation came from the NTSB. If they wanted the FBI to continue with their investigation they would have said so.
Kallstrom is a Trump supporter now and is on the right side of the issue this thread is about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.