Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sedona13
I think his point is valuable "The contents of this memo do not - in any way - discredit [Mueller's] investigation."

The press is working with all it's might to make the case that the reason the memo is public, is that Trump is trying to short-circuit Mueller's investigation. The implication being that Trump continues to try to obstruct justice.

That narrative is flawed in many ways, not the least of which is that the base claim of Russian collusion is a frameup by political opponents. It;s also flawed because while Trump is annoyed by Mueller's work, he wants the investigation to come to a conclusion so "Russian collusion" can be put to bed.

If Mueller is going to be discredited, it will be for reasons other than what the Nunes memo discloses.

39 posted on 02/02/2018 10:59:59 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

I agree. Chris Wallace is already pointing to Pappadapoulis as the start of the Russia probe, which is troublesome itself. So, you’re spying on a political opposition candidate based upon alleged drunken ramblings of a junior aid. Throw the dossier out as not credible and you have no Probe. However, if Mueller is an honest investigator, which heretofore Gowdy has nothing public to say at this time he isn’t (his past withstanding - he just hasn’t released anything except to file a few indictments of Manafort, Pappadapoulos and Flynn) - he should come to the conclusion that there is no there there.


107 posted on 02/02/2018 11:38:22 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson