Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With A Single Question, Meghan McCain Leaves Democrat Senator Stammering
The Federalist ^ | 1/29/18 | Bre Peyton

Posted on 01/29/2018 7:03:05 PM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: markomalley

Direct link:

https://youtu.be/tfuZKI4sTp8?t=300


41 posted on 01/30/2018 4:37:43 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

I’m not sure I see the downside of thinning the herd of Canada Geese.


42 posted on 01/30/2018 6:17:17 AM PST by cyclotic (Trump tweets are the only news source you can trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cyclotic
I’m not sure I see the downside of thinning the herd of Canada Geese.

Not only is it really really cruel (the goslings peeping endlessly in confusion for their mothers, mated pairs separated, etc.), but it is scientifically a stupid way to attempt control. If you remove the resident population of geese, considering the prime habitat they occupied, more geese will promptly colonize it. I used to take my biology classes out to Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge for nature walks and the favorite bird that they saw on the trip was ALWAYS the Canada geese and their goslings. How could I explain to them, since the anal orifice Gillibrand sneaked that stupid legislation into a food stamps bill, that the cute baby goslings they admired would, in a couple of months, be rounded up and gassed?

43 posted on 01/30/2018 9:01:54 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What stupid replies by Senator Gillibrand.


44 posted on 01/30/2018 9:09:56 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Not only was Clinton given a pass, the Hollywood glitterati ponied up bigtime for Clinton's sex mess defense.

Herewith, for your edification, are the Certified Democrat Degenerates......the scum that vilify and destroy America's Judeo-Christian ethics and values in movies promoted as being "diverse, politically correct, and socially relevant."

HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINANCED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS

According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.

Thanks to Hollywood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidency—combined. Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:

<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, gave $60,000;

<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;

<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;

<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;

<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.

Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:

<><> singers Tony Bennett and feminist Barbra Streisand;

<><><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;

<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;

<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.

=========================================

<><> How did the Hollyood elite list payments to Clinton's sex defense fund on their corporate statements AND on their tax returns?

<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?

<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?

<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"

The biggie is the tax element.

<><> Did donors deduct it as a “business expense”,

<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a "liability?"

<><> Did Clinton document it as "income"?

<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?

cont

45 posted on 01/30/2018 4:12:56 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
cont

When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandal—Harvey Weinstein.

Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year.

Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2) Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.

Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.

Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?

46 posted on 01/30/2018 4:13:30 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
Leaving the WH, going to invent ways to exploit Billy's BJ for votes.

Final solution---"nobody's business but ours" even as he got BJ'ed on our dime.

47 posted on 01/30/2018 4:22:18 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 Trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
So allegations against Republicans are taken as gospel and while she wants to wait to "get the facts" when it comes to Dems?

Meanwhile, Bill Clinton, who had more than just allegations, is continued to be given a pass because 'that was then?'

Well, she's got the typical liberal hypocrisy/double standard down.

48 posted on 02/01/2018 9:02:12 AM PST by Moonlighter (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Note: this topic is from 1/29/2018. Thanks markomalley.

49 posted on 02/19/2018 4:48:43 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson