Posted on 01/28/2018 5:13:10 AM PST by davikkm
President Trump should fulfill his promise to the United States of America and to American citizens that voted for him, said Angel Wife Ruth Johnston Martin of the White Houses Thursday-revealed amnesty proposal. And what did he promise? He promised no DACA, no deals. Martin, an ordained chaplain and board member of The Remembrance Project, made her comments on Thursdays edition of SiriusXMs Breitbart News Tonight with co-hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.
We say no to this bill, said Martin. No to DACA; no to amnesty.
Angel Families support for Trump is based on the presidents stated opposition to amnesty, said Martin.
[Donald Trump] was the only candidate to respond to our organizations The Remembrance Projects concern over illegal immigration, said Martin. He wasnt seeing this as a soft subject. He saw it as severe. People are losing their lives, and he came out to Houston, Texas, to our conference. He sat around our table with all our Angel Families, and he listened to our stories one-by-one. He heard about our losses.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Angel Moms and Angel Wives, know we are 100% behind you.
And we are legion, capable, and filled with a terrible resolve.
No gratitude; No DACA.
Food for thought: How would Disney react?
People choose jumping the gate at Disney (trespass) without permission to entry. Said individual brings along one or more of his/her children. Would security at Disney hesitate to toss the intruders back over the stiles when detected?
The intruder avoids capture and demands the right to remain (illegally). The intruder goes on to open a business (hot dog stand) on the fairway competing against Disneys own people/businesses. Does Disney have an ounce of pity for the man and his business or does security bounce the trespasser?
After years of hiding among other authorized patrons the child ages, enjoys the facilities, accepts the many pleasures and delights. This poor child now determines being within Disney to be a right. Upon discovery, will the cries for sympathy from the child and others prevent Disney from throwing the child back over the stiles?
Adding insult to injury, this illegal is now expecting the many relatives, close and distant, to be given a free pass because it is only right not to separate them from their family. And finally, is it really wrong or illegal to jump the gate at Disney in the first place if the sob story is heart wrenching enough?
The security people at Disney would be real monsters to penalize these children when it wasnt the childs fault they are in the park illegally. s/
These DACA dreamers are adults now so they should stop calling them children, the rats and rhinos allowed them in and bastardized the immigration laws to accommodate them. Build the wall, kill chain migration and visa’s and then we will sit and talk about the “child dreamers” at a later date, this should not be # 1 on the agenda the rats are dictating the narrative. Let all the dreamers prove their usefulness for citizenship, a job, a trade that is beneficial to the US, not social services, welfare, food stamps and disability social security
It’s time for the people to do some heavy lifting. We need to make it very clear to our Congress Critters that we do not support DACA in any form. That we want a wall. That we want immigration enforced. That we want even legal immigration reduced and that we want E-Verify to clean up the business practices of the GOPe. We can’t expect Trump to do it all and we can’t permit our congress to go squishy.
Trump will call the Democrat’s bluff. The Democrats don’t want Trump to win one of their issues. The Democrats will sabotage the possibility of a deal. Why... the s_hole comment alone was enough to kill any deal with a racist Trump.
She is correct. Absolutely.
Relax, Angel Mom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.