To: Stingray51
"The department is not providing text messages that were purely personal in nature," Ummmm, they were paid for by the taxpayers. Fork `em over.
2 posted on
01/27/2018 5:29:46 PM PST by
glorgau
To: glorgau
"Ummmm, they were paid for by the taxpayers. Fork `em over."
Not to mention the fact that they were probably doing most of their scheming while they were on the clock. Isn't there a government rule that your department-issued phones aren't to be used for personal communications?
18 posted on
01/27/2018 5:42:25 PM PST by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: glorgau
An excellent way to stop romance in the workplace
19 posted on
01/27/2018 5:42:57 PM PST by
hoosiermama
(When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
To: glorgau
The reasoning for that is strikingly similar to Hillary Clinton’s excuse for failing to turn over all of her emails. Hmmmmm
To: glorgau
What, no Carlos Danger Johnson pictures or boobies? What a useless den of federal imperialist thugs........
67 posted on
01/27/2018 7:36:31 PM PST by
blackdog
To: glorgau
"The department is not providing text messages that were purely personal in nature,"Just like the Hillary emails were all about yoga and grandchildren. Total BS. If they are innocuous, then let Congress see them.
68 posted on
01/27/2018 7:38:28 PM PST by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: glorgau
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson