Weak excuse. I’ve had Revisionists claim the Jews got so mad at Stephen that they bit him. Can I attribute that to you?
Further, you’re going to pontificate about incorrectly explaining texts just before citing “I’ve been told?” That’s chutzpah.
So where’s the verse that gives revisionists the leeway to ignore the verses on how women are to be attired or have their heads covered?
Weak excuse.
Hey, it's what your fellow Roman Catholics have claimed.
I’ve had Revisionists claim the Jews got so mad at Stephen that they bit him. Can I attribute that to you?
I've not seen that ever before.
Further, you’re going to pontificate about incorrectly explaining texts just before citing “I’ve been told?” That’s chutzpah.
No...it's Roman Catholic chutzpah....
Full Question: Is apostolic Tradition, apart from the Bible, inerrant or can it contain errors?
Answer: It is inerrant, and because it is inerrant, apostolic Tradition will never contradict the Bible, which is also inerrant.
https://www.catholic.com/qa/is-apostolic-tradition-apart-from-the-bible-inerrant-or-can-it-contain-errors
Did you go to Catechesim class?
So where’s the verse that gives revisionists the leeway to ignore the verses on how women are to be attired or have their heads covered?
Changing the topic already??