Good analysis. I do a lot of my Q reading over on The_Donald. He absolutely has some true believers onboard there, but also some profoundly persuasive debunkers. So far the latter have made the stronger case.
This is all I ask. Make the case. Instead I get...insults.
Unpersuasive.
I don’t think the aware veteran red piller’s care that much if the stubbornly resistant to truth are persuaded any more. It’s not worth the grief and the bother to try and drag stubborn resistant folks kicking and screaming into awareness they are so fiercely resistant to.
As Diogenesis (one of my very favorite posters here) appears to indicate in the image they posted above, some must just see Q as a rallying point for us to stoke the passions. I just don’t agree, considering that it very likely could be an adversary of some sort.
If it wants my support, it will have to earn it, starting with building trust. And right now it looks like the last thing I would be willing to trust, especially since its whole existence seems to be built on a false pretense of actually being prophetic in any way, which it hasn’t truly proven to be. T
he core analogy appears to be throwing a bunch of crap up against the wall, and seeing if some of it might have stuck, when viewed after the fact. With all respect to my few friends that are still supporting it.
So is golden eagle in the same room with you or are you both?
Most of my Q reading is done here at FR. I do not yet believe or disbelieve. I do find many of the items provocative, and with thought, some persuasive.
Q, if real, is a 21st century manifestation of “preparing the battlefield”, where some verifiable information (perhaps only in hindsight) can be gleaned, but is more in the flavor of a psychological exercise in girding the people for things yet to be revealed.
It is very tempting to place a lot of doubt in Q’s column, because of what many of us “know” and suspect has occurred during the Obama regime and under Hillary as SoS. But, while avoiding the temptation to overly trust, I do find a lot of parallels with current news and earlier Q posts - although I freely admit I have not performed any formal analysis to correlate items.
Take all information as potentially viable, as well as suspect. Momentous things are happening, I think, but the Trump administration tries to do things in the right way - including when keeping secrets is the right way.
Time, as always, will tell.
Just my $.02.