Let me try another approach. Let's set aside your theory of disproving our Q theory based on our so called "refusal to debate."
Imagine this if you will. A roomful of people that are discussing a questionable issue. They are all in general but varied levels of belief in that issue. They are discussing it and trying to learn as much as they can about it because it is potentially VERY important.
During the discussions, people who have no idea what is going on but are curious, enter the room. They begin peppering the "cult members" with accusatory questions. They call them cult members koo koo birds, larpers, goofballs, conspiracy theorists, etc. You get my point.
It isn't just one guy. It's a long line of them. Some downright hostile. Then along comes little old fantasywriter. Acting just as they do. How do you think you should be received? Politely? Offered a cup of tea? To sit in my favorite chair? I would say to you. Dude. Do what I did.
Read along, study up. Look at the things offered to you. Then make up your own mind. Either buy into it, or don't. If you buy into it,then by all means, pull up a chair. If you don't be on your way, and leave the cultists to their insane business. They aren't bothering anyone.
But you say you have done that. You have done your research and you have made up your mind. You find it bunk, hogwash, a larp, a cult, a bunch of doody head meanies.
So what do you do about it? You lean up against a wall and shoot spitwads at everybody and try to convince them they are idiots.
I don't see the logic in that. Can you explain? Are you hear to convince or be convinced. Those are the only valid reasons to be here that I can see.
Did you like my LARP?
Mom says I'm the best LARPER ever.
MOM! MEATLOAF!!
It’s true that I’ve followed Q from the beginning. Most of the Q threads I read are on The_Donald. The vast majority of pedes have given Q pretty short shrift. For example, a true believer will post a thread detailing the latest proof of Q’s authenticity. Not half a dozen posts into the thread I watch said proof get purely annihilated. It blows up real good.
My natural tendency would be to just throw the whole thing over and ignore it. But then I keep thinking there MUST be something I’ve missed. There simply has to be some insight or prediction that slipped passed me. Otherwise, why the near-religious devotion of an ever growing number of people?
So I come onto one of these threads—which I typically avoid—and try to elicit information.
Then the insults, lies and smears fly. Additionally, people relentlessly order me to get off the thread. I get reported as a troll. And of course, there’s the aforementioned condemnation to hell.
I still don’t understand it. Why is it so offensive to merely inquire as to the most convincing information Q has revealed? You’d think his more enthusiastic fans would be brimming over with the desire to list Q’s most momentous reveals. Instead, I get flipped a figurative middle finger.
I will always be open to compelling evidence. But it’s got to actually mean something. I don’t need to be taught to think for myself, which someone said was Q’s mission. I need something that I wouldn’t otherwise know. Some piece of insider information that actually amounts to something. So far, I haven’t seen anything close.