Please don't give up on me, Fantasywriter. You still might win. Keep trying.
Yes, you CAN tell from these two approaches which one has the facts. It’s very simple, really. When your position depends on silencing anyone who questions it, it’s bogus.
No, No, a trillion times no. How do you not get this.
You are right in one small part. It IS very simple. Let me be veryu precise. You use climate change, so I will also.
There is the truth. The climate is either changing or it is not. The truth is, that it is. It always has and always will. The real question is does man made activity affect climate change. It does not. There. That is the unalterable truth.
No amount of argument, ad campaigns, public exposure, silencing of opposition, mockery, or any other means of unfair argument can change the truth.
Many years ago, all people thought the earth was flat. Then some said it was round. They argued. They silenced, they mocked, etc. All the while, and forever before, the earth was not flat. The truth was always the truth. And so it goes with every disagreement.
Do you see my point? All your talk of climate change does nothing for your argument. You are still trying to make the manner of argument evidence of the truth. That is false.
You lose. I win.
We can continue if you like. I'm having fun.
You 100% missed my point again. We are talking completely past each other. This could last a month and go nowhere.
I’m out, but just for the record, I never mentioned climate change. Global warming is the modern day name of the theory of man-made global warming. Warmist is another term for the same theory. It has nothing to do with climate change. It is about the alleged anthropomorphic cause of warming.