Dude, I've seen us Qbirds called all manner of vile names. From kooks to Nazis. Far more invective is thrown about by your side. Be honest. You know this. Anything you receive is a natural reaction to that. I'd say the Qbirds are quite tame in their response.
We are just trying to fight the good fight as best we can against our corrupt government and are constantly being belittled and sniped at by our own.
Think about that.
ThankQ
‘Far more invective is thrown about by your side. Be honest. You know this.’
Fail, just utter fail. First, I usually avoid Q threads...like the plague. Second, some weeks ago it appeared to me that Assange was legitimizing Q. At that point I more or less became a passive, conditional believer; Assange knows more about it than I do.
Since then I’ve had my doubts. Tonight’s experience, however, has sealed the deal. I know how people who are defending the truth argue. They don’t get down in the gutter. The truth and the gutter don’t mix. The ad hominem I’ve seen tonight put me squarely back in the Q-hoax corner. It was *persuasive.*
Dude, I’ve seen us Qbirds called all manner of vile names. From kooks to Nazis. Far more invective is thrown about by your side. Be honest. You know this. Anything you receive is a natural reaction to that. I’d say the Qbirds are quite tame in their response.
We are just trying to fight the good fight as best we can against our corrupt government and are constantly being belittled and sniped at by our own.
Think about that.
These conversations are remarkably similar to those FR experienced prior to President Trumps nomination and eventual election.
It’s rather bizarr, I think. As for me, I do not know enough yet to disclaim Q, nor would I want to - I accept Q as is.