[There is a clear climate signature in the disaster in Santa Barbara. We know that climate change is making California’s extreme rainfall events more frequent. We know it’s worsening our fires. We know that it contributed substantially to the latest drought.]
Um, no we don’t. Always bolster your so-called argument with a false narrative to begin with. The left’s stock in trade.
It’s called winter rains.
It happens every year in CA.
If she can afford to live in Santa Barbara, she can afford to deal with its problems.
So climate change is causing extreme rain and drought concomitantly? That’s a neat trick.
What these liberal tools will never understand why most of us oppose their views and theories on this. Frankly, we don’t care what they believe in - if they think fairy dust can turn Shetland ponies into unicorns, go for it.
But when it comes to global warming and climate change, we are vehemently opposed to the solutions they’re proposing. They require massive wealth distribution from rich countries through leviathan-scale bureaucracies who do not answer to the USA directly. What was the last estimate? More than $15 trillion raided and redistributed?
All this while even they admit that the so-called solution might not even have much of an impact. No thank you. The cure is definitely worse than the “disease” here and we will disagree with you that using oil, gas, and coal is a disease.