Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonely Bull

Never-Trumper turned compromising sometimes-never-trumper Hugh Hewitt dug himself a deep hole. He strongly attacked Trump for using a certain word, not because it was vulgar, but because it was racist. Then Hewitt went into a discussion of countries, including those he has visited, Guatemala, Mexico, etc. He made a whole string of comments that were negative about those countries and how he never wanted to go to any of them. His standard seemed to be “If the door to the hotel opens on the parking lot then it is beneath him.” But he used non-racist soft words like “unpleasant” rather than allegedly racist words.

I found his whole presentation and WAPO editorial to be extremely hypocritical. Apparently it is not racist if you use the PC words to describe reality.


22 posted on 01/12/2018 5:13:37 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: spintreebob
Never-Trumper turned compromising sometimes-never-trumper Hugh Hewitt dug himself a deep hole. He strongly attacked Trump for using a certain word, not because it was vulgar, but because it was racist. Then Hewitt went into a discussion of countries, including those he has visited, Guatemala, Mexico, etc. He made a whole string of comments that were negative about those countries and how he never wanted to go to any of them. His standard seemed to be “If the door to the hotel opens on the parking lot then it is beneath him.” But he used non-racist soft words like “unpleasant” rather than allegedly racist words.

The very same elites who get the vapors over harsh language don't even blink about the FBI and DNC gross misuse of the Federal government to wiretap the Trump campaign.

47 posted on 01/12/2018 5:46:59 AM PST by Flick Lives (https://goo.gl/GxGKQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: spintreebob
Never-Trumper turned compromising sometimes-never-trumper Hugh Hewitt dug himself a deep hole. He strongly attacked Trump for using a certain word, not because it was vulgar, but because it was racist. Then Hewitt went into a discussion of countries, including those he has visited, Guatemala, Mexico, etc. He made a whole string of comments that were negative about those countries and how he never wanted to go to any of them. His standard seemed to be “If the door to the hotel opens on the parking lot then it is beneath him.” But he used non-racist soft words like “unpleasant” rather than allegedly racist words.

I found his whole presentation and WAPO editorial to be extremely hypocritical. Apparently it is not racist if you use the PC words to describe reality.

I'll admit that I'll wait to read anything of that sort because my stomach is partially full and I don't want anything coming back up--but if that's what he writes, then I agree with you that his reaction is fundamentally flawed.

48 posted on 01/12/2018 5:47:17 AM PST by Lonely Bull ("When he is being rude or mean it drives people _away_ from his confession and _towards_ yours.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: spintreebob

Hugh Hewitt is on at 6 AM in my area so thankfully I never have the radio on that early.


51 posted on 01/12/2018 6:14:17 AM PST by Ciexyz (I'm conservative & traditionalist, a nationalist and patriot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: spintreebob
Pajama boys. Real men (alpha) cuss sometimes. Get the flip over it! This issue is so 💩 hole!
69 posted on 01/12/2018 7:44:59 AM PST by Lopeover ( The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson