I certainly recognized the pun, but it was not the incentive for my post.
She looks fairly guilty in the mug shot and fairly not guilty in the glamor shot. Realizing that mug shots usually portray people in a less than flattering light and glamor shots usually portray people in an overly flattering light, I think it may be hard to get a unanimous decision either way on this one. The mattress is the van is certainly a factor mitigating in favor of a not guilty verdict, though.
“...The mattress in the van is certainly a factor mitigating in favor of a not guilty verdict... “
What if the van had shag carpet and wood panelling? Would that sway the verdict towards guilty?