Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bird45

I don’t understand.. aren’t receivers treated as if they were guns?

My understanding is that you can’t build a gun as described.
Unless the machine shop was manufacturing the receivers themselves.


21 posted on 01/07/2018 11:00:31 AM PST by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Toughluck_freeper

It’s an 80% receiver in “as-cast” condition that has machining remaining to turn it into a functional receiver. Current law allows someone to do this for themselves but it is not for sale or transfer.


22 posted on 01/07/2018 11:08:21 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Toughluck_freeper

That’s pretty much my understanding. A customer of mine — a precision tool & die outfit — had a customer with Remmington. The manufacturing area had to be physically separate from the rest of the operation and every component was serialized with full traceability. Federal requirement.

My guess is that MSN doesn’t understand the Law, and easily fell for a false story, repeating it to their own embarrassment.


35 posted on 01/07/2018 1:07:58 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson