Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrankR

There needs to be a legislative clarification on the federal status of pot laws. It’s not incumbent on the enforcement arm to pick and choose which laws will be enforced or ignored.


8 posted on 01/07/2018 6:48:11 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Spok

“There needs to be a legislative clarification on the federal status of pot laws. It’s not incumbent on the enforcement arm to pick and choose which laws will be enforced or ignored.”

That’s what I’ve been thinking. If there is a LAW against pot, then how could Colorado, or Obama, or any of his people, just, all-of-a-sudden make it LAWFUL?


11 posted on 01/07/2018 6:51:00 AM PST by FrankR (On the knees is not a good place to be...a man on the knees is only half a man.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

Really? I guess you don’t understand that we have thousands of crimes on the books that are never enforced.


28 posted on 01/07/2018 7:06:39 AM PST by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Spok

That is a fair point. Thanks.


131 posted on 01/07/2018 8:52:23 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Spok
It’s not incumbent on the enforcement arm to pick and choose which laws will be enforced or ignored.

193 posted on 01/08/2018 7:58:15 AM PST by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson