To: Drew68
"Rep. Devin Nunes, once sidelined by an ethics inquiry from leading the House Intelligence Committee..."More fake news from the WaPo. By failing to tell the whole story - that Nunes was cleared - they are no better than the National Inquirer.
5 posted on
12/31/2017 11:17:47 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
To: norwaypinesavage
By failing to tell the whole story - that Nunes was cleared - they are no better than the National Inquirer. If you had fought through all the way to the second sentence of the article...
"The California Republican was cleared in December of allegations he improperly disclosed classified information..."
39 posted on
12/31/2017 12:14:22 PM PST by
semimojo
To: norwaypinesavage
“By failing to tell the whole story - that Nunes was cleared - they are no better than the National Inquirer.”
First sentence, paragraph 2:
“The California Republican was cleared in December of allegations ...”
To: norwaypinesavage
They’re trying to divide the right.
58 posted on
12/31/2017 1:16:24 PM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: norwaypinesavage
The National Inquirer actually is better - they actually got Edwards to step down. WaPo would just spike the story until it was politically expedient.
67 posted on
12/31/2017 1:37:22 PM PST by
setha
(It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
To: norwaypinesavage
I suspect the standards at the Enquirer are higher than they are at the ComPOST.
To: norwaypinesavage
I would say WaPo is worse than the National Enquirer.
Good for Devin Nunes!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson