Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeauBo

I think I read somewhere that most direct falls from 30 ft. or more onto a hard surface are fatal, perhaps not immediately (which might be worse...)


184 posted on 12/28/2017 5:38:15 PM PST by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.

“I read somewhere that most direct falls from 30 ft. or more onto a hard surface are fatal”

Essentially true.

There is a very detailed paper from NASA (https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930020462.pdf), from which figure 5 (p. 36) is most useful.

The summary is:

It does depends on where and which way up you land - feet-first onto a soft surface is best (pretty obvious).

For a hard surface, assuming you don’t land on your head, up to about 12m/s impact velocity, you are almost certain to survive (corresponding to a fall from a height of about 23 feet). Though “survive” is likely to involve life-changing injuries at the top of this range.

Between 12 and 17m/s, you may or may not survive (corresponding to a fall from between 23 and 39 feet).

Over 17m/s, you are almost certain not to survive (corresponding to a fall from over 39 feet).

Anecdotally, pole workmen and tree arborists seem to cite 9 meters (~30 ft) as the “cutoff” for fatality in a fall — that is, most who fall from thirty feet or higher die.


218 posted on 12/28/2017 7:28:40 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson