To: BradyLS
Twentieth century America had a long tradition of relying on highly trusted news casters to keep them informed, beginning with radio demigods like Edward R Morrow, William Shirer, John Cameron Swayze. That carried over into the TV era with the invention of the onscreen anchor. No one suspected them of being dishonest demagogs.
To: hinckley buzzard
Dishonest demogogues, yes, and in the case of Cronkite a closet Communist throughout his career. Cronkite only admitted it after he retired and during an interview on the old CNN Larry King show.
19 posted on
12/27/2017 6:39:50 AM PST by
Avalon Memories
(The question about.out fighting back is not what average people can to do, but how to do we do it?)
To: hinckley buzzard
Until the sixties, when the men coming back from Vietnam pretty much uniformly asserted that the war was nothing like what the television media was describing.
People had to decide whether they believed the news readers or the Veterans. To many chose the idiot box. Many who chose television reevaluated their decision in the late eighties, but relationships with and the lives of the Veterans they rejected were damaged beyond complete repair by that point.
I believe that the scope of the Vietnam betrayal was the largest factor in the rise of the alternative media, and Rush Limbaugh launched on radio at about the time Americans reassessed Vietnam.
25 posted on
12/27/2017 7:07:09 AM PST by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: hinckley buzzard
No one suspected them of being dishonest demagogues.
A few people thought so--but they were called "extremists" and shunned by polite society. :-(
33 posted on
12/27/2017 7:40:25 AM PST by
cgbg
(Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson