Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence That Vince McMahon Is Planning To Revive The Most Radical Football League Ever — The XFL
Business Insider ^ | 12-24-2017 | Tyler Lauletta

Posted on 12/24/2017 6:41:41 PM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Future Snake Eater

I agree, the XFL chances have come and gone.

Now, if Vince was smart....he’d go and introduce Rugby to the American public, with glamor and hype pumped into it....which he is an expert.


61 posted on 12/24/2017 8:13:20 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam

Finance it through their own Draftkings type FF.


62 posted on 12/24/2017 8:14:29 PM PST by demsux (The "Mockingbirds" have come home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Much better than any college team.


63 posted on 12/24/2017 8:16:01 PM PST by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hartford might get a team...hope he does...


64 posted on 12/24/2017 8:28:17 PM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Starting a competing, serious pro football league is a great idea. Reviving the XFL and all the nonsense that went along with it isn’t.


65 posted on 12/24/2017 8:43:43 PM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

66 posted on 12/24/2017 9:36:25 PM PST by Baynative ( "If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Or Australian rules football. Part rugby, part American football, part bar fight.


67 posted on 12/25/2017 5:21:06 AM PST by nonliberal (Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sometimes the threat is greater than the thing itself. If there is a legitimate threat of competition with the NFL, then it could bring about needed changes. Then again, we are talking about the NFL.


68 posted on 12/25/2017 5:48:32 AM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

I imagine that prompted a Lombardi rant of galactic proportions!


69 posted on 12/25/2017 5:53:07 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ll watch it unless it’s some sort of Pay-Per-View scheme.

Then, I won’t.


70 posted on 12/25/2017 5:55:11 AM PST by Peter W. Kessler ("NUTS!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Wait wait wait wait wait! I see no commitment from McMahon that he will demand respect for the National Anthem and the Stars and Stripes by the staffs and players. At what point would I want to watch a doofus leauge of potential orthopedic casualties and brain-damaged football players who are going to do the same thing the NFL is doing?


71 posted on 12/25/2017 8:23:06 AM PST by righttackle44 (Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; BenLurkin
no fair catches? - BenLurkin
Kickoffs and punts.
I’m not impressed with that change, and IMHO they should keep the rules requiring facemasks - which only date back to 1960 or so, but are de rigeur for avoiding (inobviously, but . . .) spinal cord injuries.

Otherwise, to make the roughness of the game less limited you would go back to immediate post-WWII rules. Meaning, for one thing, that you had to stop a runner, not just touch him before his knee hits the ground. I was very young then, and could not tell you precisely how the rule was enforced - but I know runners would crawl forward even after being tackled.


72 posted on 12/25/2017 11:19:42 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson