Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

Can someone explain how declaring a mis-trial and then having another trial is good for the Bundy’s. I would want the jury to know that the BLM was corrupt. You can bet that none of this past history will be allowed to be mentioned in a new trial. The government can go into a new trial looking clean again. A new trial simply erases the governments past behavior.


74 posted on 12/20/2017 1:52:33 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revel
The judge ruled a mistrial. She has not decided if it will be "with prejudice" or not. "With prejudice" means the court prohibits further prosecution of the matter.

I can't imagine how she could not grant the motion "with prejudice", given the revelations in Special Agent Wooten's letter.

75 posted on 12/20/2017 1:57:51 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson