To the best of my memory ....
1) As I recall, the woman who said DJT sexually assaulted her in a First Class seat while a male passenger saw the entire assault but did nothing, didn't count on that anonymous man irately coming forward to call her a liar and say no such assault occurred, (but she could of course count on the MSM to ignore the inconvenient Debunker).
2) And the former Apprentice contestant who claimed assault in a hotel room? I seem to recall her cousin a few days later expressing wonderment at her story, because she had only given her family the most glowing reviews of DJT during - and long after - her Apprentice stint. But later when she tried cashing in on her 15 min of fame by opening a restaurant in her name, and DJT declined the invite to fly out for opening weekend to generate the media buzz that could have possibly made it a financial success, she turned on him, calling him a back stabber & traitor. But still her family heard nothing about any assault, until they saw her up there at the Presser.
3) The photo journalist's assault accusation was a self-debunking Nothing Burger when reading the details: While at a Mar-a-Lago celebrity fundraiser, leaning over to snap a poolside shot, she felt something bump her protruding butt, yet didn't turn around to see, because she thought it was the camera bags of a female colleague. By the time she'd framed and shot her photos & stood up & turned around, there was nobody there. The nearest was a small group that included Regis Philbin & DJT among others, and from merely this she concluded it had to be DJT who bumped her butt. And now, 6 yrs later, she was first confiding her story, to the best of her year's-old recollection.
I didn't look into the others, but wouldn't be surprised if they're like the rest.
Is there a website with a collection of these debunkings? Wikipedia is of little help, focusing mostly on the accusers' stories and ignoring the debunkers.
Lisa West: “We know. Anyone who says he doesn’t know is lying.”
She’s suffering a case of delusions of grandeur. Get’s an F on her persuasion skills.
Oh and before I get started. I'm not at all saying this does not happen. I'm only saying that when there is no evidence and years have gone by the allegation is baseless and thus should be ignored. We as a society have a presumption of innocence which dictates we ignore baseless claims. With that out of the way, here is my prediction.
The continuing barrage of sexual harassment claims are going to literally destroy the opportunities for women in the workplace. Bottom line, when a women can simply accuse a man and with no evidence whatsoever destroy his livelihood and his life, men will naturally take steps to protect themselves from this threat. What does this mean? It means men will STOP hiring women and putting them in positions of influence. Equal opportunity for women in the workplace is going to take a huge step backwards. The Liberal left originally started and promoted the women's movement and in classic fashion they themselves will destroy it.
Maybe now somebody will spill the beans, with proof, about Hussein and Reggie.
Well, talking to the wife, this is definitely targeted to women. She believes the claims. I absolutely 100% do not. She doesn’t think women would make claims for notoriety. I do.
What particular harassment happened right in front of everyone's eyes that is being denied again?