This is how it works with the Fake Media. The media want a statement from Nikki that they want to make their headline. So they ask a question to which she can only answer one way - the way they would like her to answer. If they asked a general question -
does a woman making a charge of sexual misconduct against a man have a right to be heard ? The answer is yes. Now if the question were a little more specific -
does a woman making a charge of sexual misconduct against Trump have a right to be heard ? The answer is still a yes, obviously, because it doesn't matter who the woman is making the charge against; she has a right to be heard. But the media now have their quote. So the headline becomes 'Nikki says any woman making a charge of misconduct against Trump has a right to be heard', to suggest she meant it specifically for Trump. The implication is there is reason to believe Trump is guilty of sexual misconduct. That's what they want the reader to conclude from the headline.
I have simple rule when reading Fake Media news stories - I discard the article right at the headline. Fake headline, as in the story is not what the headline suggests it is, followed by a fake story. All fake beginning to end.
