I am not vested in his guilt...just trying to discover the truth.
It seems fairly obvious that the additional writing was simply added by someone (Nelson) documenting that a “celebrity” had signed their yearbook. Perfectly understandable. But the rest of what was written seems very obvious that it was written by Moore. Handwriting analyst Arthur Anthony has determined that. So what are you going to do with that information? And why is Moore denying that he wrote it?
If you’re not vested in his guilt, why do you insist he’s guilty despite overwhelming proof to the contrary? She admits forgery of the yearbook entry. The portion that was supposedly his signature turns out to be lifted from her divorce papers. Even if he had signed her yearbook, there’s nothing about that which would point to his guilt in having attempted to rape her. Her entire story has been revealed as a lie, yet you insist he’s guilty of trying to rape her. Why?