Has anyone raised the possibility that the prosecution
was part of the trial charade? Could they have
purposely overcharged the accused knowing that there
was no way a murder conviction could be obtained based on
the circumstance and evidence? Sure there was a crime
more than a mere case of a felon in possession of a
firearm. I would think they should have covered all
bases. Maybe the DA has an election coming up.
Based on the rapid and highly antagonistic in-your-face militant left wing “SOUND BITE” proclamation by the defendants lawyers immediately following the verdict, and the super weak public response of the prosecutor, YOU ASK A VERY LEGITIMATE QUESTION!
I think your theory has plausibility.
Very interesting.
DA’s always have an election coming up.