Replies

You referenced, in the last sentence of your previous post, one characterization of women that you alleged men don’t want and one characterization of women that you alleged men do want.

My request is for an in-real-life differentiation between women you feel match the first characterization and women you feel match the second characterization.

I did not mean to say that most men prefer most women to be sterile most of the time. Nor that most women prefer hormonal deranged sterility, either because it feels better for them (it doesn't) or because they think the men want them that way.

But the sterility revolution, sparked one century ago (Margaret Sanger opened her first birth control clinic in 1916) and having become the ruling ideology since the past half-century (dating from the first hormonal contraception in the mid-60's) is pushing society as a whole further and further away from women who are natural, whole, and intact, that is, fertile.

The advance from contraception--> abortion--> marital buggery--> same-sex buggery--> gender-scrambling--> sex-organ cutting --> sex robots --> societal extinction is not so much a slipper slope as a logical super-highway.

OK, so here's Woman 1.0: Sexuality strongly intertwined with fertility at every level: erotic, emotional, physical, social, spiritual.

That's the way we are, and It's OK to Be a Woman.

Here's Woman 2.0: Sexuality denatured, neutered, fertility sabotaged her sexuality cut down to size. What size? The size of being an entertainment option.

That's the way we're not, but have to be made that way. In this, the trannies and pretty boys have an advantage in that they can function sorta like sterile women without being women at all.

The sex-bots have the ultimate advantage, in that they can function like sterile women without being HUMAN at all.

Then comes the End.

Pope Paul VI said as much in 1968, and people said he didn't know what he was talking about.