Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CIB-173RDABN
What I read was that he was “playing” around with the gun and it went off. Supposedly the round ricochet before hitting the woman in the chest area. Involuntary manslaughter would have been the correct verdict.

Is that what they charged him with?

49 posted on 12/01/2017 3:10:10 PM PST by Paradox (Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Paradox

No the jury had three options from 1st degree down to manslaughter - so they had the option of involuntary manslaughter. Even if it was not on purpose (the defense) the reckless handling of a fire arm in a crowded public place should have gotten him manslaughter.

As other have pointed out, I suspect the fix was in and the prosecution may not have been as strong as it could have been.

I do not know one way or another but it is strange such an open and shut case (video and confession) would lead to a not guilty verdict


56 posted on 12/01/2017 4:44:09 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson