“Yes, the “long stalled peace process” that never was.”
As I understand the definition of the word “process”, it is a series of steps performed to obtain a pre-defined outcome. Kind of like sticking pellets into a plastic molding machine and coming out with a nice shiny timing belt cover.
They are BUTCHERING the language here. In this case there is no pre-defined outcome...no one knows if any type of ‘peace’ will come of it. What they’re really saying is that Israel needs to bend over and take it...because that is necessary for this to be a ‘process’.
Sickening. At least during Vietnam, they called it the Paris Peace Talks (back when people took words seriously), not the “Paris Peace Process”...because, like now, no one know the end result.
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
1-This has nothing to do with the "peace process". The move has been delayed for several decades not because of a "peace process", but due the the damage to our national security the move would cause.
2-Stop the leaks, deliberate. If we're going to do it, fine, if not, we'll be more secure. But 20+ years of talking is enough. The + referring to the years discussing it before Congress passed a law requiring the move.