There IS a difference between being a philanderer and a predator.
One is legal, the other can be criminal.
I would hate to see people convicted for LEGAL activities.
If what Lauer’s accuser said is true, why is he not being charged with rape?
Maybe it’s the old ‘I know what am, what are you?’ thingie.
It plays out as...
I am a lover.
You are a philanderer.
He is a predator.
I am a connoisseur.
You are a tippler.
He is a wino.
I am forthright.
You are blunt.
He is a blowhard.
“If what Lauers accuser said is true, why is he not being charged with rape?”
Well, from what I read of the one accuser’s story, she doesn’t seem to have actually said “no” to any of his requests or resisted him. Kind of hard to make a case that something like that was “rape”.