Replies

I have heard that Canada guards this out-of-wedlock birth information like nuclear secrets. I have also heard that Stanley Ann didn’t register under her real name, and that the baby wasn’t named either Barry or Barrack Obama on the Canadian BC. It doesn’t mean the records will never be available, just that it likely won’t be easy to access and verify them.

Otoh, exactly how vital are these records? It’s so easy to see what happened. The reason no one saw SA in HI during or after the birth—and the reason the address listed on both the fabricated HI BC and the birth announcements is one where SA and the baby NEVER lived—is because SA was bundled off to Canada to give birth.

This explains why the first sighting of Stanley Ann and her newborn was 2,683 miles away from where she ***supposedly*** gave birth.

This also explains why three firsthand witnesses described what was in Obama’s records file in HI as “handwritten.” It wasn’t a BC; it was the shady birth registration that Granny Dunham arranged after SA changed her mind about giving up the baby. Of course, it explains the stolen SS# too; Granny managed to get some notes into Little Barry’s file, and that triggered the birth announcements, but didn’t automatically produce a legal SS#.

Finally, it explains why Obama claimed, at various times, BOTH HI hospitals as his place of birth. He needed to find out which one would play along. Apparently part of the deal was that Abercrombie would deliver a letter, purportedly from Obama, confirming Kapiolani as his place of birth. Kapiolani displayed the letter and fund-raised off it...UNTIL they were told they were committing fraud unless Obama really was born there. Then the letter quickly disappeared and has not been publicly seen since.

Only a Canadian birth explains everything. There’s no realistic doubt as to that being Obama’s birthplace.