[NEMDF]

So we are to be expected to believe that after Moore signed the gal’s yearbook with that salacious message in 1977, his secretary put her initials next to his signature? RIGHT

[BamaBelle]

Do you have a reading comprehension problem? It was Nelson who copied Moore’s signature from a legal document...geez

[madison10]

No, we are expected to believe that D.A. meant district attorney, that is what the accusers thought it meant. Unknown to them D.A. was the initials of Judge Moore’s assistant. Sort of like when I put POA after I sign for my parents.

The morons probably copied/forged. the signature from the divorce papers.

[datricker]

I'm confused about this D.A. thing - wasn't he a deputy district attorney. Who is D.A and why would his initials be in the year book - Gloria used a court document to get his signature to forge?

• McConnell spends $30 million to defeat in a primary
• Gloria Alred is involved
• People are saying the evidence is overwhelming but it doesn't seem like that is the reality just people repeating something until it becomes the accepted truth
• This is from a long time ago memories are hazy
• The usual suspect are telling/yelling at us that the judge has to step aside - why don't they want voters to vote and decide?
• This latest sexual harassment stuff is being done by liberals (Since the Harvey Wienstein accusations)

These things suggest this is a setup to smear and disqualify a candidate who was going to win going away.

I haven't followed Judge Moore and don't know really the first thing about him other than he is very conservative and Christian. What is this over whelming evidence? Why am I so wrong in seeing this a smear job based on the list above?

As I see these are the possibilities.

1. The judge is innocent and this a smear job
2. The judge is a pervert and this a smear job
3. The judge is a pervert and this is his comeuppance and Gloria Alred is representing somebody telling the truth

I'm thinking its option 1. What did he do that he has admitted to? What charges he hasn't copped to that have evidence that looks credible? I think he should ride this out.

There is a lot I don't understand here but its pretty clear the uniparty types (Romney, Jeb, McConnell) don't trust the voters of Alabama to sort this out. If the evidence is so overwhelming these elitest still think the voters are going to vote him in? It doesn't make any sense

[rdcbn]

So we are to be expected to believe that after Moore signed the gal’s yearbook with that salacious message in 1977, his secretary put her initials next to his signature? RIGHT

---

No, we are to be expected to believe that after Moore signed the gal’s yearbook with that salacious message in 1977, the woman who will be his secretary 20 years in the future put her initials next to his signature