There u go again.
I gave u an opportunity to demand the accuser go under a live
interview, just as Judge Moore did so her answers can be judged
as well.
Yet, you only want 1 interview to seal the deal for you.
I would not hold my breath on Moore stepping aside and your
boy Mo Brooks stepping in, which is really what this is all about
for Mo Brooks supporters here.
I wish she would interview. I want the truth to come out.
Roy was given an opportunity to totally dismiss the charges. He fumbled.
Doesn’t recall asking out and making out with high school girls when he’s in his 30s? That would be so easy for me to reply. I HAVE NEVER EVER DATED, MADE OUT WITH, OR ASKED OUT HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS WHEN I WAS IN MY 30s OR OLDER.
I was planning to vote for him so I don’t like the situation. HE DAMNED SURE DIDN’T HELP IT WITH HIS ANSWERS. That’s not my fault.
And you’re right. He’s not going to step aside.
You are trying to respond to one argument with a completely different one that is not a response. Yes, I would completely agree, their stories should be vetted and put under just as much scrutiny to verify if their timeline even matches up which has not even been attempted (not to mention that there evidence to support even worse allegations against Menendez that were not and are not being covered at all - because he’s a Democrat), but what does that have to do with whether or not he should be able to recall dating these women? You are the one that is “going again” by not responding and trying to start secondary arguments.
Try to have an honest conversation for once if you are capable of it. You are the same guy who said I was actively campaigning on here for Cochran to defeat McDaniel in the Mississippi primary some years ago, claimed I was encouraging people to vote for McConnell in the primary 2014 even though I didn’t even for him in that primary myself, and claims I disappear and only show up during elections and am some sort of operative, etc. None of it true, but yet you have still said it.