Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

No, it isn’t relative to the tale.

The issue is her apparent history of making similar claims that were false. If she was 14 at the time, her sexual history since then is irrelevant.


202 posted on 11/12/2017 7:46:24 AM PST by MortMan (NFL kneelers: A colonoscopy is not supposed to be a self-exam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

I went to a all-men’s college in a rural area.

It was the perception among the locals that we were all headed for success, which, in local terms, was more or less true.

So, at open social events, we would encounter young beauties a) from other colleges; and b) from the area.

The age range on townies was 13-23 or so. Thirteens are easy to spot, but as you go to 14 and above, the right-hand tail of the hotness and maturity bell curve becomes increasingly convincing.

No guy, even a drunk guy, would KNOWINGLY go with a fourteen year old, at least not in my day. But a girl with a fake ID who lied about her age and had “dated” other college-aged men?

THAT HISTORY IS HIGHLY RELEVANT.


203 posted on 11/12/2017 7:57:26 AM PST by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson