Posted on 11/06/2017 11:35:41 AM PST by detective
Organizations like Fusion GPS pay so called "journalists" to report false information. And there is currently no review, no oversight and no way to know how common this is.
That would explain why they hide their bank records.
I doubt they had to pay “journalists” to spew negative news about Trump/republicans. They do that regardless of being paid extra.
Is it reasonable to think that bribes would show up on the books?
There’s a reason they are called ‘presstitutes’..................
OF COURSE THEY DID!!!!
Thats why one hires Fusion GPS over any other firm or agency.
They did up the filthiest of dirt and invent that which they cannot find. As do dozens of firms.
Their key selling point is the can get the CNN, NYT, WaPo headline with this dirt...all on the same day.
Theyre world-class experts. And they are very expensive.
I doubt major media allows payment of Journalists, but I’m quite sure it is done at the corporate level.
They don’t want to pay journalists because that pushes the corporate slush fund away from the table.
As Rush says: Follow the money!
Of course. It’s one big sleezy and criminal rat family.
Fusion GPS’s competitive advantage was they could both produce Fake News on your opponent, they could get it placed in the Mainstream Media.
Maybe the New York Times could look into this..../s
Fusion GPS is everywhere. They are also spoofing company names too. They need to be looked into, deeply.
Organizations like Fusion GPS pay so called “journalists” to report false information. And there is currently no review, no oversight and no way to know how common this is.
It is hidden but there is a very explosive story yet to be uncovered. "Nose candy" may be some payment.
A high percentage of “news” is filler provided by PR companies. Most news is fake news, even on a good day.
I just heard a snippet of the witch on Hannity talking about the dossier. What she said that was amazing was that the dossier was still being evaluated.
Still being evaluated?
Does she mean she paid twelve million dollars for the report before it was verified?
And that people who put it together did not evaluate the information?
Someone should wrap that little admission around her boom handle. It is a clear admission on her part about how bogus the whole thing is. She was trying to smart talk her way out of a hole and only when into it deeper.
This is what I heard from a guest on Sean Hannitys radio show a week or so ago. That Fusion was paying out payola to journalists for what to say, what NOT to cover. It makes sense because the mass verbatim talking points could only happen this uniformly over 30 networks and shows IF they were paid to use those exact words.
Im disappointed that Congress agreed to keep their bank records from public scrutiny.
Truly an enterprise of the swamp.
This is EXACTLY why they fear the release of their bank records. If those records ever became public, it actually could destroy public confidence in the media...for the other 90% of the country that still believes them.
It's more likely that the Partisan Media paid for the privilege of printing Fusion's fake news. Thanks detective.
You are so correct. The only way to get to the bottom of any Clinton/Democrat scandals is to follow the $.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.