Wow.
Now, I might suggest that if the Uranium One deal were entirely on the up and up, it might be normal for two senators to work with the Secretary of State on a major deal. But here are the issues with that:
1. The letter mentions specifically hiding their role from the (Senate Foreign Relations?) Committee. It’s after the fact; why wouldn’t whatever convinced Corker and McCain be something they could be open with towards the whole committee?
2. The use of raw political power hurts her argument that the deal couldn’t be corrupt, because it required so many approvals. Who’s expected to push back against her?
3. What’s this about “General Adams” opposing her? Is this Gen. Chris Adams, the former associate director of Los Alamos National Labs?
4. Lastly, notice which e-mail address Clinton is using.
Do we have video of those two traitors repeating Hillary’s talking points?
At the link there are two different emails for Hillary. What is the significant information?
Nah, no “colusion” at all between the democrats and their national press corpse at ABCNNBCBS. None at all.
From the pdf:
“we have a statement ready to respond to the Kyl op ed. We also have briefed Durbin and McCain and both staffs so
they hopefully are ready for sunday shows. We also did a conference call with meet the press producers with the
negotiaing team. In addition, we have a fact sheet and excerpts from previous testimony ready to be sent to all senate
offices rebutting the alleged “secret deal” with Russia. We will continue making the national security case and working
with bob corker, but he wants some distance between us and him - that’s what allowed him to be with us in committee.”