[FreeReign]

So you know the Grand Jury witnesses.

Both you and I don't know the Grand Jury witnesses. And even if we did, Grand jury witnesses are sworn to secrecy.

But I do know what two Grand Jury witnesses said.

No you don't. You're citing supposed unnamed grand jurors, who would be breaking the law, by commenting on the grand jury proceedings.

Trump hired Mulehead. Why don’t you get that basic fact. He interviewed him the DAY before RR “hired” him. And if you think RR hired him without consulting Trump, you’re delusional.

Neither Trump nor any named WH source has said that Trump hired Mueller. And even you believe such an unnamed "source", the unnamed source supposedly said that Trump interviewed Mueller for the FBI position. It's your delusion to say that it's a "fact", that "Trump hired Muller" to be special investigator.

You are incapable of even evaluating evidence from what we call “primary sources.”

No. As demonstrated, the incapability is all yours.

[Electric Graffiti]

You're right, of course. There's been a whole lot of twitter attention-whoring and drinking going on out there. People citing sources from the voices in their own heads.

This coup by special counsel, sanctioned by the corrupt-state, was obvious to any sober & rational person since Rosenstein appointed it.

[Fresh Wind]

And even if we did, Grand jury witnesses are sworn to secrecy.

Nope. Look it up. You can start here, and take particular note of this statement "The rule does not impose any obligation of secrecy on witnesses."

[LS]

No they aren’t. Your entire argument gone in one sentence.

Further, news today confirms what I said. Investigation 2012-2013 offshore wires.

Way before Trump.