1) I’m not sure they were under oath in talking “voluntarily” to the Senate Intelligence Committee. Anyone know if they were under oath? If not, there may be no legal perjury issue no matter how much they lied.
2) Depending upon precisely how any questions and answers were worded, we may be looking at typical Clintonesque evasions rather than explicit lies. For instance, if the question is “did the Clinton campaign have a contractual relationship with Fusion GPS blah blah” the literal answer may well be “NO” since both the Clinton campaign and the DNC were evidently using their Demoncrap law firm as the cut-out to handle these matters. So unless questions are worded perfectly and exhaustively (e.g., did any money from the Clinton campaign or DNC go to any law firm or other agency which may have had any relationship with Fusion GPS?) the Clintonites will pretend they answered accurately and their allies in the MSM will rally around them.
It is a felony to lie to or even mislead Congress regardless of whether one is under oath. When you see an oath administered in a televised hearing, it’s strictly for show.
And Congressional hearings are almost completely scripted. Most involved can be seen reading notes or even reciting from a script.
.
When you lie to the Feds, it is always a crime.
When they lie to us, its for our own good...
.