Posted on 10/24/2017 4:40:16 AM PDT by simpson96
When Hollywood types walk the red carpet, gathering to pay tribute to their virtue -- while lecturing the rest of us about our moral and political sins -- an image comes to mind.
Jesters
That's the first thing I think of when Hollywood award shows come on TV: a dance of medieval jesters in motley and harlequin, wearing curly-toed boots upon their two left political feet. They scamper excitedly upon that red carpet, chatting with celebrity journos, and later they hold golden trophies and make fine speeches.
Not all of Hollywood is a farcical grotesquerie, but the overwhelming liberal virtue-signaling becomes unbearable, with every award show a mummer's farce as jesters heap glory upon themselves and their lords.
A dark lord like Harvey Weinstein, a Hollywood lord without peer.
They feared him, and they loved him as the fearful and the broken love those with absolute power over them. He was someone who could do wonders for their careers if only they would submit and serve his appetites.
Perhaps actress Meryl Streep, in what is now a cringe-worthy moment, said it best when accepting a 2012 Golden Globe award for her portrayal of Lady Margaret Thatcher in a Harvey Weinstein-produced film, "Iron Lady."
Streep thanked her agent, Kevin Huvane, and one other.
"And God, Harvey Weinstein," she said to great applause, "the punisher, Old Testament, I guess."
Weinstein had built a reputation as a punisher. But God?
Perhaps the word came to her mind because he could reach down and bend and shape not only American culture from the silver screen but shape and twist careers too. So who said Hollywood irony was dead?
Weinstein indeed was a lord of Hollywood, a lord of culture, with celebrities and Democratic politicians sucking up to him for political funds and access to
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Harvey a dark lord? More like a dirtbag.
That will come back to bite hard, b/c all the people that knew about this provision---even the lawyers who drew it up---are now material witnesses.
The moral vacuity and scummy depravity of Hollywood is writ large in such a provision....b/c nobody at the Winestein Company had the decency to notify L/E that crimes were being committed by this peckered monster.
They should be charged w/ aiding and abetting.
NOTE: A material witness is a person with information alleged to be material (solid and incriminating) concerning a criminal proceeding.
REAL cowboys have the Bull $#!# on the OUTSIDE of their boots.
Oops, wrong thread.
Pride goes before the fall but Harvey had his season of glory until the laws of karma eventually do kick in. Hollyweirdos are sanctimonious leftard hypocrites of shallow substance.
HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINACED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS
According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.
Thanks to Hollyood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidencycombined.
Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:
<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, who have given $60,000;
<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;
<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;
<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;
<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.
Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:
<><> singers Tony Bennett and Barbra Streisand;
<><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;
<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;
<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.
When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandalHarvey Weinstein.
Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. Thats small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2)
Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.
Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.
Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?
========================================
<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"
<><> How did the Hollyood elite list payments to Clinton's sex defense fund on their tax returns?
<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?
<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?
“Dance of the fools”
Also, how about “Dances with Wolves?”
Meryl Streep should be ashamed of herself. I wonder what will happen to her career with her Trump bashing & praise of Weinstein.
Great collection.
`Don’t kick cow chips on a hot day.’
That’s OK. Harvey is now a cold chip.
Hollywood - shallow court jesters - you’re right - ‘shallow’ is the right word. What’s sad is these lowlifes prop up the democrat party with wads of cash - to protect abortion - and the perks of movie making...
Why abortion?
Because the ‘Weinsteins’ of Hollywood don’t want ‘babies’ to mess with their abuse... and old female ‘stars’ don’t want young attractive women having a hold on their moneybags...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.