Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop

.
Such things are not “classified at birth” as they are in the western world.

You cannot judge western technology by Chinese press releases.

Were it not for Loral/Clinton donating our tech to them, their rockets would still be bonfires close to the launch pad.
.


8 posted on 10/23/2017 4:34:19 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
"Such things are not 'classified at birth' as they are in the western world."

Or nearly as exclusive. China, along with our American bosses, pumped quite a few PLA students through our university engineering programs since at least the '80s. My English Comp 2 instructor said that she was a PLA officer, and so was her husband (maybe 1987 or 1988, IIRC).

IBM publicized a couple of its discoveries in nano-tech between 10 and 20 years ago. Novel, eh? At about the same, a rare back-page news article or two talked about China pouring some big efforts into nano-tech. Nano technology is what the topic is more properly called here. But "quantum" sounds so groovy, like "turbo" in the '70s.

In most important cases during the era of capitalism in a more G-d-fearing environment of the past, men in manufacturing preceded useful inventions.


20 posted on 10/23/2017 5:56:17 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson