Did you actually read that and think that I was advocating for the need to have 60 votes for cloture?
Or were you just trying to deflect and make it look like I was wrong about something that I was saying.
I was explaining to you what a supermajority is, as you have been using the term incorrectly. The example of needing a supermajority for cloture was just that, an example.
Of course it is an archaic rule. Everyone knows that. And of course it can be changed. That is common knowledge. It already has been for Supreme Court nominations. So we agree on this well known fact.
Though I will point out that the Democrats did not change the rules to pass Obamacare. They actually managed to get the required supermajority of 60 votes.