Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SuperLuminal

Please show, other then an uncorroborated claim in the article, where there is any proof that she personally sent the SVR agents back?

Just because someone in the Federal government made the decision to do so, that does not mean it was her.

I think she is a lying dyke criminal who clearly took huge bribes washed through the the CGI in many cases, but that does not make her guilty of every nefarious act in DC.


47 posted on 10/21/2017 1:14:11 AM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Strac6
"Please show, other then an uncorroborated claim in the article, where there is any proof that she personally sent the SVR agents back?"<

Well now...For decades the demoncrats have operated on the "stated" belief that proof is not the key. Any "claim/accusation" is sufficient to assert guilt and investigate endlessly.

There is no doubt that she personally shipped her commie buddies out of harms way.

With anything associated with the clintonista crime family: "We don't need any steenking proof!"

61 posted on 10/21/2017 10:30:25 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson