Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twotone

So a $10Bn pound investment produced 243 GWh of power over a 25 year period, or nearly 10GWh per year. Perhaps you had better do the math.


12 posted on 10/20/2017 2:19:36 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

The costing is a lie anyway, like everything coming from the gangreen. It did not include the interconnexion cost (which is astronomical for any offshore installation), not the maintenance cost, not the intermittancy cost, not the distmantling cost...


23 posted on 10/20/2017 3:01:18 PM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
So a $10Bn pound investment produced 243 GWh of power over a 25 year period, or nearly 10GWh per year. Perhaps you had better do the math.

I recall that during the California black-out crisis under Grey Davis, 1 MWh of electricity was going for about $109.

243 GWh is 243,000 MWh, multiply by $109, we get $26.5 million, convert into pounds is something like ₤10 mil.

So it cost ₤10Bn to generate a total of ₤10 mil worth of electricity.

38 posted on 10/20/2017 4:19:00 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson