Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SE Mom
I’m not defending nor attacking Sessions on this yet. There’s so much knne-jerk reacting going on it’s silly. This is SPECULATION and is not confirmed by anyone as true. IF Sessions does refuse to release the NDA, then we’ll have cause for alarm.

I am with you on the knee-jerk reacting. Just as a matter of information, there is a Justice Department manual on how investigations are to be conducted and it specifies that while there is an active investigation, people involved are not allowed to discuss the matter or to release information or evidence. If there is no investigation or if one has been completed without findings to warrant prosecution, these restriction don't apply.

When looked at dispassionately the fact that an Attorney General would refuse to discuss an issue of concern or to release a related piece of evidence, especially at the expense of having his reputation sullied, would indicate that an investigation was ongoing and that the officials involved were following established procedure. Adherence to procedure might not be satisfactory on a TV show or discussion forum, but it is crucial in a successful prosecution.

88 posted on 10/20/2017 11:26:26 AM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: etcb

Not only is the headline misleading, it has not even been legally established that there is such a person or that such a person signed a ND agreement.

Victoria Toensing did not contact Sen. Grassley. The Senator has had to write a letter to her office asking to speak to her client.

Much of this stuff on FR is blogger driven nonsense.


93 posted on 10/20/2017 11:31:36 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson